IPAV PRESS RELEASE |
19th JUNE 2006 |
AUCTIONEERS SEEK CLARITY
ON NEW ‘GREEN TAX’ CERTIFICATE |
| |
| Auctioneers today (Monday) called on the Minister
for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government to clarify the
situation surrounding the introduction of the proposed new Energy
Savings Directive or ‘green tax’. |
| |
| The first part of the Directive, which will require
all new houses to provide an energy usage certificate, is due to come
into effect on January 1 next. The certificate will provide details
of how much it costs to heat a house over a year and break down the
home’s energy usage. |
| |
| IPAV Chief Executive Fintan McNamara said Minister
Dick Roche should immediately move to clarify many aspects of the
certificate.
|
| |
| “There is total confusion out there as to
how much the certificate will cost, who is going to pay for it, what
period of time the certificate will cover and so on,” he said.
“All we are getting at the moment are heresay second-hand reports.
What is needed now is for the Minster to issue a full and comprehensive
statement which covers all aspects of the new green tax. |
| |
| “For example, given the vendor will likely
have to supply the certificate, there should be a provision protecting
him/her from litigation in the future. It may be in the best interest
of the purchaser to acquire a separate certificate.” |
| |
| Mr McNamara said it is likely that the full force
of the Directive would only apply to buildings over 1,000 square metres. |
| |
| “While there is generally support in the
property industry for measures that will save energy, it behoves the
Minister to provide full and frank details on the certificate so that
those who have the responsibility for its implementation have the
necessary time to prepare. |
| |
| He also stated that Ireland had outperformed the
Scandinavian countries by a factor of five in recent decades and that
calls to imitate that model would not enhance incomes and employment
in Ireland. |
| |
| He added that Ireland has inherited a plethora
of policies and agencies from the era of 17% unemployment and one
million at work. These were utterly inappropriate with two million
at work and 4% unemployment. A massive reduction in these agencies
and schemes was required. |
| |
| “The resources saved should be handed back
in tax cuts because the market economy had solved most of the problems
which these agencies and schemes were established to solve,”
he said. |
| |
| Ends |
| |
| 19 June 2006 |
| |
| For further information contact:
|
| |
| Fintan McNamara on 01 - 6785685 or |
| |
| Tim Ryan Communications on 087 - 2471423 |
| |
| |